EVE Search - Battle report of F4R (IAC Space)

All Channels

Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions

Battle report of F4R (IAC Space)

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Pi Patel	Posted - 2008.09.16 04:26:00 - [1] I don't normally view this nonsense, in fact this is my 1st post to these forums. So far I see a lot of clueless speculation mixed with a little truth and perhaps a touch of sour grapes. As we are fond of saying in IAC "We're not dead yet". Whether it is in its present form or a new one, we will continue to be a thorn in the side for a select few. This is in no way meant to be a threat, but a promise. We will inflict more damage than we recieve. We are just warming up, pals
Pi Patel	Posted - 2008.09.17 12:31:00 - [2] One thing is for sure, -A- are doing the likes of Rupert Murdoch proud. If Eve continues as is there will be only a few chosen alliances holding 0.0 space. It will only be a matter of time before the -A- call goes out that TCF and CVA are "not worthy" of holding space with continued pressure on any of their allies to drop standings to neut or red them. Then we are likely to see a nap between 2 of the three super powers with the odd man out the next victim. Congratulations -A-! You are the Eve equivalent of Wal-mart.
Pi Patel	Posted - 2008.09.17 18:32:00 - [3] Originally by: Svetlanna Originally by: Pi Patel One thing is for sure, -A- are doing the likes of Rupert Murdoch proud. If Eve continues as is there will be only a few chosen alliances holding 0.0 space. It will only be a matter of time before the -A- call goes out that TCF and CVA are "not worthy" of holding space with continued pressure on any of their allies to drop standings to neut or red them. Then we are likely to see a nap between 2 of the three super powers with the odd man out the next victim. Congratulations -A-! You are the Eve equivalent of Wal-mart. You are so missing the point...Please, check our alliance name, if you can gasp the meaning of it. Hey, if thats what you want to believe then more power to you. Actions speak louder than words and I have yet to see -A- bring it to any of the alliances most would consider "authorities". So, I think I "gasp" the meaning quite wll and it is you falling a little short of fully getting a "gasp" of your alliance name. On another note, I think it is wonderful that your alliance lets it greeters post on coad.
Pi Patel International House of PWNCakes Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate	Posted - 2008.09.17 22:23:00 - [4] Originally by: Svetlanna Originally by: Pi Patel snip Posting with an unidentified character and characters in NPC corporations in this forum is prohibited. If you wish to participate in the discussions here, be sure to have your corporation and or alliance status ticked in your forum settings. ~Saint You are so missing the point...Please, check our alliance name, if you can gasp the meaning of it. Try this again. I totally "gasp" the name of your alliance. I don't think you live up to it. Haven't seen -A- partake of battle festivities with any of those alliances the eve community would consider authorities. When you actually war against bob and/or goons then you may have something. Btw I think Svetlanna is a wonderful name for a greeter. Is it Indonesian?
Pi Patel International House of PWNCakes	Posted - 2008.09.25 16:08:00 - [5] Originally by: Conlin Originally by: Tyrrax Thorrk Originally by: Deva Blackfire Originally by: Tyrrax Thorrk hydra had NC support and was fighting an alliance a third their size iac had zero support and was fighting an alliance not only much larger but also much stronger pound for pound I was pretty sure that CVA napfest was blue to IAC. Or did it work "IAC halp us - ok, but dont count on us to help you back"? As for hydra - they lost most of the space in 2 weeks but even then they actually tried to counter (even by lame pos spam). Not sure how it went in IAC space... CVA napfest is blue to IAC but not involved at all, same with TCF. as for resistance, iac have been putting up some and still have 4 out of the 7 stations they had at the start of this offensive (but going to lose sov in all of them soonish) anyways not comparable to hydra's situation at all So wrong re : TCF. IAC has drawn the line in YKE , twice now we have engaged IAC on equal or they having greater numbers and twice we have beaten them back even destroying one pos . 2nd engagement involved us warping to a large amarr pos they were in the process of anchoring with Dark Trinity . We engaged and won the fight , but then IAC called in a 40 plus TCF fleet who cyno'd caps on top of us . losses were 14 -7 in our favour with TCF holding the field and IAC holding the station Everytime we engage IAC now I guess its gonna be a case of IAC crying to tcf , more reds to shoot though Thats interesting news. Since we left IAC we have been looking for some fun as have a couple of the other heavier hitting pvp corps that left IAC. Being that we still have a lot of friends left in the alliance maybe we'll go for a spin.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.